People always talk about Saint Peter. “What a horrible case of foot in mouth disease he had,” they say. “Got it wrong more times then he got it right,” they say. “Denied he even knew Jesus… three times,” they say! And, of course, they are right. Maybe that is why he considered Saint Mark to be his son. Yes, St. Peter had his share of mistakes, but St. Mark had just as many, if not even worse.
We first hear about Saint Mark in the twelfth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles. We find that his name is John-Mark and the Saints Paul and Barnabas chose him to accompany them on their first missionary journey. (vv. 12, 25) St. Paul, in his Letter to the Colossians, mentions that St. Mark was a cousin to St. Barnabas. (4:10) Unfortunately, St. Mark’s time among the missionaries got off to a terrible start. In chapter 15 of the Acts of the Apostles, we read,
Then after some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us now go back and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they are doing.” Now Barnabas was determined to take with them John called Mark. But Paul insisted that they should not take with them the one who had departed from them in Pamphylia, and had not gone with them to the work. Then the contention became so sharp that they parted from one another. And so Barnabas took Mark and sailed to Cyprus; but Paul chose Silas and departed, being commended by the brethren to the grace of God. (35-40)
So, St. Mark abandoned St. Paul and St. Barnabas, his cousin, remember, on this missionary journey when the times had gotten tough. There was a problem; they faced rejection and persecution from the Jews; Mark bailed on them. Later on, when St. Paul and St. Barnabas were ready to go off again, St. Barnabas said, “Let’s give him another chance,” and St. Paul said, “Over my dead body.” The dissension between these two missionaries who had so powerfully moved in Asia Minor that they had been mistaken for Zeus and Hermes became so great that they parted ways and did not minister together again!
Yes, St. Mark was the Yoko Ono of the early missionary church. That puts him up there with St. Peter, I would think.
There is a unique pair of verses in St. Mark’s account of the arrest of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. As Judas betrays Our Lord and the guards arrest him, the Evangelist tells us, “Now a certain young man followed Him, having a linen cloth thrown around his naked body. And the young men laid hold of him, and he left the linen cloth and fled from them naked.” (14:51-52) This passage is unique in the New Testament. Saints Matthew, Luke and John make no mention of the young man. Many believe that this passage is St. Mark inserting himself into the story. It was customary not to identify yourself as an author of a work in the Ancient Near East and none of the Gospels are attributed to their authors within the text. It is tradition that tells us who wrote which. The inclusion of this passage in St. Mark’s Gospel suggests that it may very well have been the Evangelist himself. So, not only did he break up the Disciples’ Dynamic Duo, he also ran so hard and fast away from Jesus when Our Lord was arrested that he tore off his clothes to get away. St. Peter may have denied Him, but at least he kept his clothes on!
But, wait! This last screw up, we read about it in the Gospel According to Saint Mark! Indeed, the young man rebounded from these two catastrophic showings and managed to pull himself together and make something of himself. Later, St. Paul referred to St. Mark as “a fellow laborer” and “useful to me.” (Philemon 24 and 2 Timothy 4:11) At some point, St. Mark attached himself to St. Peter who, perhaps realizing the young man had a record of failing not unlike the Prince of the Apostles himself, referred to St. Mark as “my son.” (1 Peter 5:13) Tradition tells us that, having ministered extensively with St. Peter, St. Mark recorded St. Peter’s recollection of the life of Christ and compiled the work into the Gospel According to St. Mark. Leaving Rome after St. Peter’s death, St. Mark moved south to Alexandria and established the first Christian Churches in Egypt. As St. Peter is regarded as the first bishop of Rome and the current Pope considers himself the “heir of the throne of St. Peter,” His Holiness Pope Shenouda III, the head of the Coptic (Egyptian) Church considers himself to be the heir to the throne of St. Mark. Legends say that St. Mark was finally martyred in the streets of Alexandria for speaking out against a pagan festival.
And there is the lesson for us. The young man named Mark was a failure in so many ways. He ran so hard and fast away from Christ that he lost his clothes. He ran so hard and fast away from Saints Paul and Barnabas that he prevented them from ever working together again. Yet, ultimately, he embraced the Cross of Christ to the point of recording the Gospel so that more than half of what we know about the life of Christ can be attributed to St. Mark. Many scholars, after all, suggest that Saints Matthew and Luke used a copy of St. Mark’s Gospel when writing their own Life of Christ. Beyond that, he embraced the missionary life from which he had fled earlier and established one of the great patriarchates of early Christianity. Rather than fleeing persecution, he finally faced it and received the martyr’s crown of life in Heaven.
No matter how often we fail, no matter how often we run away from what we are called to do, we may still embrace the Lord. He will always receive us again and include us in His plan, not merely as an anonymous bit player, but as a key figure who touches many and changes life. It is never too late to embrace that which Christ has called you to do. Just pick up the Gospel According to St. Mark and you will see a fine example.
Almighty God, who by the hand of Mark the evangelist have given to your Church the Gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of God: We thank you for this witness, and pray that we may be firmly grounded in its truth; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. AMEN.